|
View previous topic ::
View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
 JERIC 
Fleet Admiral (Proprietor)
Joined: Feb 12, 2002
Member#: 1
Posts: 4939
Location: Richmond, VA
     
     |
 Posted:
Sun Feb 23, 2003 2:44 pm Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
 
|
As a result of the disappointing 2002 Oscar Nominations for best soundtrack, StreamingSoundtracks.com has developed an award system of what we believe who deserves to be nominated. The winner will be determined by votes in this poll.
We will conduct the same poll for 2001 & 2000 after this one is complete. This poll ends March 23rd, the night of the Oscars.
_________________
"Are you not entertained? Are you not entertained? Is this not why you are here?." -Maximus
Please do not PM me. Use email, Feedback or Contact Us links. |
|
 |
EyeDea
Lieutenant
Joined: Dec 09, 2002
Member#: 298
Posts: 204
Location: Vancouver Canada
|
|
Posted:
Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:51 pm Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
I had a tough time deciding between The Hours, Two Towers and Time Machine. But in the end, Time Machine had the charm and charisma and the motifs to carry it. Towers was a close second and Hours was third.
_________________
By responding in any way shape or form, you contractually agree that I’m right, and youre wrong. |
|
|
|
Caliburn
Guest
|
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:00 am Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
Tough one, I cant choose between The Time Machine and Two Towers lol
Oh well a month to think about that one
Jeric, are you gonna go for a nominations playlist some day? Could be fun ![[Smile]](smile.gif) |
|
|
|
sarbear
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: Dec 09, 2002
Member#: 297
Posts: 81
Location: UT
|
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 24, 2003 8:30 am Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
Is there going to be a day when we get to hear selected tracks from the options. It would be helpful in making an informed decision. |
|
|
|
Legolas
Commander
Joined: Aug 08, 2002
Member#: 178
Posts: 857
Location: Drunkest state in USA
|
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 24, 2003 10:14 am Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
I think the oscar people should be looking into Jeric's site. Then they could get a clue on who to nominate.
hmmm how could we advertise this poll??? |
|
|
|
sarbear
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined: Dec 09, 2002
Member#: 297
Posts: 81
Location: UT
|
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 24, 2003 12:49 pm Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
I couldn't help it, I made my decision and voted.. but what a hard decision that was... |
|
|
|
Whatsthatsmell?
Cadet 1
Joined: Feb 24, 2003
Member#: 367
Posts: 1
Location: Texas
|
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 24, 2003 1:03 pm Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
Come on guys we gotta give best core to LOTR!
This score was even better than Fellowship.
_________________
"I Make a living off of my dreams."
-Steven Spielberg |
|
|
|
EyeDea
Lieutenant
Joined: Dec 09, 2002
Member#: 298
Posts: 204
Location: Vancouver Canada
|
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 24, 2003 6:21 pm Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
Two Towers was a good score, but Time Machine was just a tad better. I dont know why, but there's something that Time Machine has that LOTR does not. I mean both have wonderful themes, and memorable momments, but Time Machine has that sort of extra charm that I can't describe in words, and it's this that LOTR lacks.
But vote as you wish. ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
_________________
By responding in any way shape or form, you contractually agree that I’m right, and youre wrong. |
|
|
|
Cocles
Commodore
Joined: Mar 06, 2002
Member#: 15
Posts: 2587
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Posted:
Mon Feb 24, 2003 11:45 pm Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
Eyedea, did your brother write that score or something? I swear half of your posts are all about how much you like that score and wish you could marry it then bear its children. |
|
|
|
EyeDea
Lieutenant
Joined: Dec 09, 2002
Member#: 298
Posts: 204
Location: Vancouver Canada
|
|
Posted:
Tue Feb 25, 2003 11:51 am Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
And the correct answer is: I just think it’s a VERY good score, but I know that it wont get the recondition that it deserves.
_________________
By responding in any way shape or form, you contractually agree that I’m right, and youre wrong. |
|
|
|
Cocles
Commodore
Joined: Mar 06, 2002
Member#: 15
Posts: 2587
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Posted:
Tue Feb 25, 2003 10:29 pm Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
On the contrary. Maybe what it truly needs is a "recondition." |
|
|
|
SlowMo
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: Mar 20, 2002
Member#: 29
Posts: 390
Location: Ghent, Belgium
|
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:34 am Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cocles:
On the contrary. Maybe what it truly needs is a "recondition."
ROFL
No, seriously, why the hell don't you guys just vote and shut up.. ![[Razz]](tongue.gif) This is a poll, not a discussion.
I think a poll should have it's reply button removed... Especially in this case, you are actually trying to change people's opinion if you publicly advertise your own.
_________________
"By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect 'Hungry.'" -- Gary Larson |
|
|
|
Cocles
Commodore
Joined: Mar 06, 2002
Member#: 15
Posts: 2587
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 26, 2003 3:27 am Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
Agreed. Let's at least keep our choices of who we voted for off the forum. |
|
|
|
Caray
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: Oct 17, 2002
Member#: 243
Posts: 408
Location: France
|
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:12 am Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
Agreed. I chose Spirit.
_________________
My reality cheque bounced |
|
|
|
Caliburn
Guest
|
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:25 am Post subject: 2002 SST AWARDS |
|
quote:
I chose Spirit.
DUH!?!?!
![[Wink]](wink.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
