| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Philipp82 Cadet 2


Joined: Dec 09, 2012 Posts: 6 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:36 pm Post subject: 192kbit streaming? |
|
|
I was just thinking that it would be really cool if SST could provide the stream in 192kbit quality. Bandwith shouldn't be such a big problem anymore?
Generally, I'm an audiophile and like to enjoy the best quality possible. But it is without a doubt way easier to access Music on the computer, so therefore I archive my CDs in 320kbit or FLAC-quality.
I know that some people will argue that you can hardly hear any difference between 128kbit and 320kbit but I doubt that, especially if you have a state-of-the-art stereo. So 192kbit would be a good compromise, wouldn't it?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blablublaber Cadet 4


Joined: Sep 04, 2012 Posts: 16 Location: munich, english garden
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Walter i like your idea.
but i think it costs more bandwidth and storage.
and it might get us in trouble since we are not supposed to stream looseless quality to the listeners.
it would be to easy to "rip it " into the tracks and thus circumventing the copyright. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dutchbat Captain


Joined: Aug 09, 2008 Posts: 1875 Location: Roosendaal
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Besides that what Blablublaber said, it will cost much more on payments to the broadcasting facility and we already stream at 128kb/s what is topping above most other radiostations.
And not everyone is in the possesion of equipment to enjoy the difference of the streamspeed. _________________
take a look at my collection: My album list |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
molossus Rear Admiral (Ambassador)


Joined: Aug 09, 2005 Posts: 3327 Location: Warsaw & once in a blue moon Szczecin (Poland)
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Personally I'm all for using higher bitrate stream. I think I even mentioned it somewhere in the forums before. But I'm also aware of the cost factor, so I don't think it's high priority topic. _________________ <i>"The piano keys are black and white,
But they sound like a million colors in your mind"</i>
(from "Spider's Web" by <a href="http://katiemelua.com/music/#KatieMelua">Katie Melua</a>)
Avatar is from work of art by Drew Struzan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thejoyrider Lieutenant Commander


Joined: Jan 19, 2005 Posts: 390 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm in full support of a Flac stream. Even a 500-700k OGG stream but we need to be realistic here. Radio bandwidth costs a bomb. Unless there's a package you can recommend then I don't see it happening. Yes we have moved into the HD arena and videos are now on tap in720 and 1080p but as for Flac, not quite. I don't see it as problem for others with lower speed internet as they can still listen to the existing streams. _________________ “Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present, and by each crime and every kindness, we birth our future.” |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xalira Lieutenant


Joined: Apr 02, 2009 Posts: 153 Location: Padova
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I wonder what's the bitrate for VIP users. If I'm not wrong there used to be a higher bitrate for them back in the days, and normal users had the 64k. Or am I remembering it all wrong? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
molossus Rear Admiral (Ambassador)


Joined: Aug 09, 2005 Posts: 3327 Location: Warsaw & once in a blue moon Szczecin (Poland)
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
You are right, Xalira. We used to have 128kbit stream for VIPs only. Now VIPs don't have access to exclusive stream. We have 128kbit stream for all. _________________ <i>"The piano keys are black and white,
But they sound like a million colors in your mind"</i>
(from "Spider's Web" by <a href="http://katiemelua.com/music/#KatieMelua">Katie Melua</a>)
Avatar is from work of art by Drew Struzan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xalira Lieutenant


Joined: Apr 02, 2009 Posts: 153 Location: Padova
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, mol It may be interesting to know how many people would become VIPs if a 192 or even 320kbps streaming was offered to them. The difference between 128 and 320 listening is usually consistent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
molossus Rear Admiral (Ambassador)


Joined: Aug 09, 2005 Posts: 3327 Location: Warsaw & once in a blue moon Szczecin (Poland)
|
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMHO a stream with higher bitrate was something encouraging people to upgrade to VIP. I doubt it's just a coincidence that we had had many more VIPs when better stream was part of the package.
Probably there are more reasons why number of VIPs is currently very low, but isn't access to music one of main features most of us come here for? _________________ <i>"The piano keys are black and white,
But they sound like a million colors in your mind"</i>
(from "Spider's Web" by <a href="http://katiemelua.com/music/#KatieMelua">Katie Melua</a>)
Avatar is from work of art by Drew Struzan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|